My friend Ameena Saeed lives in California, and I meet her whenever I go there.
She makes videos, and yesterday she sent me a link about Pathan, given below :
I sent a reply containing 3 links of my articles
Ameenajii
Please read these articles
https://www.hastakshepnews.com/justice-katju-asked-should-films-have-a-social-concern/
https://writerscafeteria.com/guest-blogging/why-justice-katju-opposes-the-pathan-movie/
https://www.hastakshepnews.com/pathan-moviegoers-are-like-the-roman-mob-writes-justice-katju/
Justice Markandey Katju
Ameena is a good lady but harbouring misconceptions.
She believes ‘Pathan ne chheen ke secularism wapas le liya’. But does this mean anything ?
She says Pathan has provided a platform to secular people to combat Hindu extremists, but I dont see how beating drums or lighting fireworks will end or even reduce communalism ?
She believes that Pathan has sent a message to Muslims that they should not lose their spirits. I do not know whether Pathan has uplifted the spirits of Muslims. But I wonder whether a Muslim who is being beaten for refusing to say Jai Shriram feels his spirited uplifted ?
As for full houses in Germany, those who see the film would be NRIs who do not vote in Indian elections.
